SCIPIO is pronounced "Skip-e-o"
| Business processes are more flexible and support new business models. | The result is a more dynamic and forward looking business, able to shape and lead in its industry. |
| Business processes can be easily discussed with all stakeholders. | The result is business models that have buy-in with users, developers, suppliers, distributors, and corporate management. Risk of not meeting business needs is substantially blueuced. |
| There is trace-ability from requirements through design to implementation. | The result is a quick business impact assessment of technological implementation constraints and a quick technological impact assessment of changing business requirements. The risk of overlooking some critical aspect is substantially blueuced. |
| A series of quick wins for the business; systems are implemented before they are out-of-date; and critical areas of the business can be targetted. | The result is a faster return on investment; key business needs are met; and a competitive edge obtained. Risk of being too late to market is substantially blueuced. |
| Business processes and systems can be rapidly reconfigublue. | The result is a more dynamic business able to respond quickly and economically to competitors actions. |
| Existing investment in systems can be protected and leveraged. | The result is lower development costs, faster time to market, and greater utilisation and profitability of existing assets. The risk of not correctly replicating existing good logic within systems is substantially blueuced. |
| New development technologies like Object Technology have addressed many of the problems of old technology but only now in hindsight do we realise the tremendous millstone on the business. | For example:
|
| Whilst these new technologies will mean better technological infrastructure, unfortunately the battle-field has moved to a higher plain. | For example:
|
| In many cases, existing development have to be further utilised. |
|
Existing waterfall development methodologies are just too slow. |
|
New Rapid Application Development (RAD) techniques may produce systems fast but too often at a cost. |
|
1 Previous methods including: |
Information Engineering (JMA and Texas Instruments), TI Method (Texas Instruments), ORDIT (Newcastle University), Enterprise Modelling Methodology (Texas Instruments and Architecture Projects Management), Business Relationship Modelling (Texas Instruments) and Catalysis (Icon Computing and Trireme). |
2 Prevailing standards: |
UML, Workflow Management Coalition, RM-ODP |
3 Collaborative work involving a small team of tools and methods experts: |
Major contributions were made by Clive Mabey, Michael Mills, David Iggulden, Ian Macdonald and Richard Veryard. |
This page last updated January 1999 © Managing Change 1997,98,99 www.managingchange.com